Theory of Accident Causes (2022)

Adams, JGU. 1985. Risk and Freedom; The Record of Read Safety Regulation. London: Transport Publishing Projects.

American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1962. Method of Recording and Measuring Work Injury Experience. ANSI Z-16.2. New York: ANSI.

—. 1978. American National Standard Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. ANSI D6.1. New York: ANSI.

—. 1988. Hazardous Industrial Chemicals—Precautionary Labeling. ANSI Z129.1. New York: ANSI.

—. 1993. Safety Color Code. ANSI Z535.1. New York: ANSI.

—. 1993. Environmental and Facility Safety Signs. ANSI Z535.2. New York: ANSI.

—. 1993. Criteria for Safety Symbols. ANSI Z535.3. New York: ANSI.

—. 1993. Product Safety Signs and Labels. ANSI Z535.4. New York: ANSI.

—. 1993. Accident Prevention Tags. ANSI Z535.5. New York: ANSI.

Andersson, R. 1991. The role of accidentology in occupational accident research. Arbete och halsa. 1991. Solna, Sweden. Thesis.

Andersson, R and E Lagerlöf. 1983. Accident data in the new Swedish information system on occupational injuries. Ergonomics 26.

Arnold, HJ. 1989. Sanctions and rewards: Organizational perspectives. In Sanctions and Rewards in the Legal System:
A Multidisciplinary Approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Baker, SP, B O’Neil, MJ Ginsburg, and G Li. 1992. Injury Fact Book. New York: Oxford University Press.

Benner, L. 1975. Accident investigations—multilinear sequencing methods. J Saf Res 7.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1988. Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. Morb Mortal Weekly Rep 37(S-5):1–18.

Davies, JC and DP Manning. 1994a. MAIM: the concept and construction of intelligent software. Saf Sci 17:207–218.

—. 1994b. Data collected by MAIM intelligent software: The first fifty accidents. Saf Sci 17:219-226.

Department of Trade and Industry. 1987. Leisure Accident Surveillance System (LASS): Home and Leisure Accident Research 1986 Data. 11th Annual Report of the Home Accident Surveillance System. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

(Video) Theories of accident causation

Ferry, TS. 1988. Modern Accident Investigation and Analysis. New York: Wiley.

Feyer, A-M and AM Williamson. 1991. An accident classification system for use in preventive strategies. Scand J Work Environ Health 17:302–311.

FMC. 1985. Product Safety Sign and Label System. Santa Clara, California: FMC Corporation.

Gielen, AC. 1992. Health education and injury control: Integrating approaches. Health Educ Q 19(2):203–218.

Goldenhar, LM and PA Schulte. 1994. Intervention research in occupational health and safety. J Occup Med 36(7):763–775.

Green, LW and MW Kreuter. 1991. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Guastello, SJ. 1991. The Comparative Effectiveness of Occupational Accident Reduction Programs. Paper presented at the International Symposium Alcohol Related Accidents and Injuries. Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland, Dec. 2-5.

Haddon, WJ. 1972. A logical framework for categorizing highway safety phenomena and activity. J Trauma 12:193–207.

—. 1973. Energy damage and the 10 countermeasure strategies. J Trauma 13:321–331.

—. 1980. The basic strategies for reducing damage from hazards of all kinds. Hazard Prevention September/October:8–12.

Hale, AR and AI Glendon. 1987. Individual Behaviour in the Face of Danger. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hale, AR and M Hale. 1972. Review of the Industrial Accident Research Literature. Research paper No. l, Committee on Safety & Health. London: HMSO.

Hale, AR, B Heming, J Carthey and B Kirwan. 1994. Extension of the Model of Behaviour in the Control of Danger. Vol. 3: Extended Model Description. Sheffield: Health and Safety Executive project HF/GNSR/28.

Hare, VC. 1967. System Analysis: A Diagnostic Approach. New York: Harcourt Brace World.

Harms-Ringdahl, L. 1993. Safety Analysis. Principles and Practice in Occupational Safety. Vol. 289. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Heinrich, HW. 1931. Industrial Accident Prevention. New York: McGraw-Hill.

—. 1959. Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Hugentobler, MK, BA Israel, and SJ Schurman. 1992. An action research approach to workplace health: Intergrating methods. Health Educ Q 19(1):55–76.

(Video) Theories of accident causation

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1967. Symbols, Dimensions, and Layout for Safety Signs. ISO R557. Geneva: ISO.

—. 1984. Safety Signs and Colors. ISO 3864. Geneva: ISO.

—. 1991. Industrial Automation Systems—Safety of Integrated Manufacturing Systems—Basic Requirements (CD 11161). TC 184/WG 4. Geneva: ISO.

—. 1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Vocabulary. ISO/DIS 8402. Paris: Association française de normalisation.

Janssen, W. 1994. Seat-belt wearing and driving behavior: An instrumented-vehicle study. Accident analysis and prevention. Accident Anal. Prev. 26: 249-261.

Jenkins, EL, SM Kisner, D Fosbroke, LA Layne, MA Stout, DN Castillo, PM Cutlip, and R Cianfrocco. 1993. Fatal Injuries to Workers in the United States, 1980–1989: A Decade of Surveillance. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH.

Johnston, JJ, GTH Cattledge, and JW Collins. 1994. The efficacy of training for occupational injury control. Occup Med: State Art Rev 9(2):147–158.

Kallberg, VP. 1992. The Effects of Reflector Posts on Driving Behaviour and Accidents on Two-lane Rural Roads in Finland. Report 59/1992. Helsinki: The Finnish National Road Administration Technical Development Center.

Kjellén, U. 1984. The deviation concept in occupational accident control. Part I: Definition and classification; Part II: Data collection and assesment of significance. Accident Anal Prev 16:289–323.

Kjellén, U and J Hovden. 1993. Reducing risks by deviation control—a retrospection into a research strategy. Saf Sci 16:417–438.

Kjellén, U and TJ Larsson. 1981. Investigating accidents and reducing risks—a dynamic approach. J Occup Acc 3:129–140.

Last, JM. 1988. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lehto, MR. 1992. Designing warning signs and warning labels: Part I—Guidelines for the practitioner. Int J Ind Erg 10:105–113.

Lehto, MR and D Clark. 1990. Warning signs and labels in the workplace. In Workspace, Equipment and Tool Design, edited by A Mital and W Karwowski. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Lehto, MR and JM Miller. 1986. Warnings: Volume I: Fundamentals, Design, and Evaluation Methodologies. Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical Publications.
Leplat, J. 1978. Accident analyses and work analyses. J Occup Acc 1:331–340.

MacKenzie, EJ, DM Steinwachs, and BS Shankar. 1989. Classifying severity of trauma based on hospital discharge diagnoses: Validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Med Care 27:412–422.

Manning, DP. 1971. Industrial accident-type classifications—A study of the theory and practice of accident prevention based on a computer analysis of industrial injury records. M.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.

McAfee, RB and AR Winn. 1989. The use of incentives/feedback to enhance work place safety: A critique of the literature. J Saf Res 20:7-19.

(Video) Accident Theories for Accident Prevention

Mohr, DL and D Clemmer. 1989. Evaluation of an occupational injury intervention in the petroleum industry. Accident Anal Prev 21(3):263–271.

National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control. 1989. Injury Prevention: Meeting the Challenge. New York: Oxford University Press.

National Electronic Manufacturers Association (NEMA). 1982. Safety Labels for Padmounted Switch Gear and Transformers Sited in Public Areas. NEMA 260. Rosslyn, VA: NEMA.

Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA). 1985. Specification for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags. CFR 1910.145. Washington DC: OSHA.

—. 1985. [Chemical] Hazard Communication. CFR 1910.1200. Washington DC: OSHA.

Occupational Injury Prevention Panel. 1992. Occupational injury prevention. In Centers for Disease Control. Position Papers from the Third National Injury Control Conference: Setting the National Agenda for Injury Control in the 1990s. Atlanta, GA: CDC.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1990. Behavioural Adaptation to Changes in the Road Transport System. Paris: OECD.

Rasmussen, J. 1982. Human errors. A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. J Occup Acc 4:311–333.

Rasmussen, J, K Duncan and J Leplat. 1987. New Technology and Human Error. Chichester: Wiley.

Reason, JT. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge: CUP.

Rice, DP, EJ MacKenzie and associates. 1989. Cost of Injury in the United States: A Report to Congress. San Francisco: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California; and Baltimore: Injury Prevention Center, The Johns Hopkins University.

Robertson, LS. 1992. Injury Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Saari, J. 1992. Successful implementation of occupational health and safety programs in manufacturing for the 1990s. J Hum Factors Manufac 2:55–66.

Schelp, L. 1988. The role of organizations in community participation—prevention of accidental injuries in a rural
Swedish municipality. Soc Sci Med 26(11):1087–1093.

Shannon, HS. 1978. A statistical study of 2,500 consecutive reported accidents in an automobile factory. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.

Smith, GS and H Falk. 1987. Unintentional injuries. Am J Prev Medicine 5, sup.:143–163.

Smith, GS and PG Barss. 1991. Unintentional injuries in developing countries: The epidemiology of a neglected problem. Epidemiological Reviews :228–266.

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). 1979. Safety Signs. SAE J115: SAE.

(Video) ACCIDENT CAUSATION THEORIES I S :101

Steckler, AB, L Dawson, BA Israel, and E Eng. 1993. Community health development: An overview of the works of Guy W. Stewart. Health Educ Q Sup. 1: S3-S20.

Steers, RM and LW Porter.1991. Motivation and Work Behavior (5th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Surry, J. 1969. Industrial Accident Research: A Human Engineering Appraisal. Canada: University of Toronto.

Tollman, S. 1991. Community-oriented primary care: Origins, evolutions, applications. Soc Sci Med 32(6):633-642.

Troup, JDG, J Davies, and DP Manning. 1988. A model for the investigation of back injuries and manual handling problems at work. J Soc Occup Med 10:107–119.

Tuominen, R and J Saari. 1982. A model for analysis of accidents and its applications. J Occup Acc 4.

Veazie, MA, DD Landen, TR Bender and HE Amandus. 1994. Epidemiologic research on the etiology of injuries at work. Ann Rev Pub Health 15:203–21.

Waganaar, WA, PT Hudson and JT Reason. 1990. Cognitive failures and accidents. Appl Cogn Psychol 4:273–294.

Waller, JA. 1985. Injury Control: A Guide to the Causes and Prevention of Trauma. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Wallerstein, N and R Baker. 1994. Labor education programs in health and safety. Occup Med State Art Rev 9(2):305-320.

Weeks, JL. 1991. Occupational health and safety regulation in the coal mining industry: Public health at the workplace. Annu Rev Publ Health 12:195–207.

Westinghouse Electric Corporation. 1981. Product Safety Label Handbook. Trafford, Pa: Westinghouse Printing Division.

Wilde, GJS. 1982. The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health. Risk Anal 2:209-225.

—. 1991. Economics and accidents: A commentary. J Appl Behav Sci 24:81-84.

—. 1988. Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accidents: propositions, deductions and discussion of dissemsion in recent reactions. Ergonomics 31:441-468.

—. 1994. Target Risk. Toronto: PDE Publications.

Williamson, AM and A-M Feyer. 1990. Behavioural epidemiology as a tool for accident research. J Occup Acc 12:207–222.

Work Environment Fund [Arbetarskyddsfonden]. 1983. Olycksfall i arbetsmiljön—Kartläggning och analys av forskningsbehov [Accidents in the work environment—survey and analysis]. Solna: Arbetarskyddsfonden

FAQs

What is theory of accident causation? ›

Accident causation theory is the art and science that seeks to understand the deeper roots of why accidents happen. Understanding accident causation theory is essential in determining why workplace incidents occur and so that we can prevent re-occurrences.

What is the best theory of accident causation? ›

The domino theory of accident causation was one of the earliest developed. The theory posits that injuries result from a series of factors, one of which is an accident. The theory is operationalized in ten statements called the Axioms of Industrial Safety.

What is multiple causation theory of accident? ›

This has led to the principle of multiple causation. According to Peterson 3(1978), behind every accident there lies many contributing factors, causes and sub-causes. The theory of multiple causation is that these factors combine together, in random fashion, causing accidents.

What are the 3 factors that cause accidents? ›

Cause factors can be grouped into the following categories: human factors/personnel error. malfunction or failure of aircraft structures, engines, or other systems. deficient maintenance.

What are the 5 Whys in accident investigation? ›

5 Whys is an iterative interrogative technique used to explore the cause-and-effect relationships underlying a problem. The goal is to determine the root cause of a problem by repeating the question “Why?”. Each answer forms the basis of the next question.

What is accident proneness theory? ›

The term accident proneness was coined by psychological research workers in 1926. Since then its concept—that certain individuals are always more likely than others to sustain accidents, even though exposed to equal risk—has been questioned but seldom seriously challenged.

What is the Swiss Cheese model of accident causation? ›

The Swiss Cheese Model demonstrates how, generally, a failure cannot be traced back to a single root cause; accidents are often the result of a combination of factors. It suggests that most accidents are the result of latent errors, which are failures that are intrinsic to a procedure, machine, or system.

What are the 3 causes of human error according to Ferrell's theory discussed in class? ›

This theory states that accidents are the result of a casual chain (as in multiple causation theory), one or more of the causes being human error, which is in turn caused by three situations – overload, incompatibility and improper activities.

What is multiple causation of disease? ›

MULTIPLE CAUSATION. The concept of multiple causation is analogous to that of the chain of disease transmission. Just as there are three links in the chain of disease transmission, there are also multiple causes of diseases rather than one simple cause for each disease.

What is pure chance theory? ›

According to the pure chance theory, every one of any given set of workers has an equal chance of being involved in an accident. It further implies that there is no single discernible pattern of events that leads to an accident.

What are the four M's of the multiple factors theory? ›

The Multiple Factor Theory

This theory holds the belief that accidents are rarely, if ever, caused by a single event. Rather, multiple factors work together and culminate into a singular accident event. These factors can vary but are typically divided into four groups: man, machine, media and management.

What are the four factors in the accident sequence? ›

Accident Sequence

Events occurring before the accident. Establish the sequence of events leading to the accident to answer the questions: who, what, when, where, and how.

Who proposed the theory of accident occurrence? ›

Heinrich's Domino Theory

According to Heinrich, an "accident" is one factor in a sequence that may lead to an injury. The factors can be visualized as a series of dominoes standing on edge; when one falls, the linkage required for a chain reaction is completed.

What are the 6 main causes of accidents? ›

Following are eight of the most common causes of accidents in the workplace:
  • Lifting. ...
  • Fatigue. ...
  • Dehydration. ...
  • Poor Lighting. ...
  • Hazardous Materials. ...
  • Acts of Workplace Violence. ...
  • Trips and Falls. ...
  • Stress.

What are the 3 types of accident? ›

  • Accidents at Work.
  • Road Traffic Accidents.
  • Sports Related Injuries.
  • Other Injury Claims.

What are three effects of accidents? ›

When we talk about effects of road accidents, it is very vast. It effect ranges from physical, emotional, social and economic effects for everyone involved. Drivers and passengers can suffer from minor cuts and bruises to broken limbs, whiplash, back and spinal injuries, paralysis and even death.

What are the types of accident investigation? ›

Introduction. The models used in accident investigation can typically be grouped into three types: sequential, epidemiological, and systemic models.

What is 5p root cause analysis? ›

The five P's stand for “parts, position, paper, people and paradigms.” While the data in this case was collected by software, the method is sound and can be used to get great results without software.

What is Domino Theory in safety? ›

What Does Domino Theory Mean? The domino theory of accident causation stipulates that injuries occur because of a series of factors, one of which is an accident. In the domino theory, all factors are connected and each of them is dependent on the preceding factor.

What is accident prone area? ›

adjective. If you describe someone or something as accident prone, you mean that a lot of accidents or other unpleasant things happen to them.

What is energy transfer theory? ›

Energy Release Theory — a theory of accident causation and control, developed by Dr. William Haddon Jr., that portrays accidents in terms of energy transference. This transfer of energy, in large amounts and/or at rapid rates, can adversely affect living and nonliving objects, causing injury and damage.

What is accident in disaster management? ›

An accident is an unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury. It is a man-made disaster and the 8th highest cause of death in India.

What is Swiss cheese technique? ›

The Swiss cheese method involves taking small bites of your task to poke holes into it. It's like teeny tiny wood ants feasting on large chunks of wood. They start biting off their herculean task at random spots until there are too many holes in it and the wood is all but a standing sculpture.

What is the purpose of Swiss Cheese Model? ›

Reason developed the "Swiss cheese model" to illustrate how analyses of major accidents and catastrophic systems failures tend to reveal multiple, smaller failures leading up to the actual hazard. In the model, each slice of cheese represents a safety barrier or precaution relevant to a particular hazard.

Is the Swiss Cheese Model a theory? ›

Swiss-cheese theory is a beautifully elegant way of illustrating the idea that before any risk can manifest, multiple barriers must be breached. This applies both to negative and positive risks although, in the case of opportunities, one might like to rephrase it that multiple enablers must all line up.

What are the 5 human factors? ›

Description. The Five Human Factors method is about studying the physical, cognitive, social, cultural and emotional factors that make up a complete customer experience.

What is meaning of accident and explain the theory of occurrence? ›

Accidents are defined as unplanned occurrences which result in injuries, fatalities, loss of production or damage to property and assets. Preventing accidents is extremely difficult in the absence of an understanding of the causes of accidents.

What is human error theory? ›

With human error theory, a violation occurs when an individual deliberately and knowingly chooses not to follow a guideline or rule.

What is diseases causation? ›

Disease Causation A disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant, especially one that produces specific symptoms or that affects a specific location and is not simply a direct result of physical injury.

What is causation in health? ›

Causation means either the production of an effect, or else the relation of cause to effect. Causes produce or occasion an effect. Some philosophers, and epidemiologists drawing largely on experimental sciences, require that causes be limited to well specified and active agents producing change.

What is supernatural theory of disease causation? ›

SUPERNATURAL THEORY OF DISEASE: IN THE EARLY PAST, THE DISEASE WAS THOUGHT MAINLY DUE TO EITHER THE CURSE OF GOD OR DUE TO THE EVIL FORCE OF THE DEMONS. ACCORDINGLY, PEOPLE USED TO PLEASE THE GODS BY PRAYERS AND OFFERINGS OR USED TO RESORT TO WITCHCRAFT TO TAME THE DEVILS.

What is biased liability theory? ›

Biased liability theory is based on the view that once a worker is involved in an accident, the chances of the same worker becoming involved in future accidents are either increased or decreased as compared to the rest of workers.

What is unsafe act and unsafe condition? ›

The unsafe act is a violation of an accepted safe procedure which could permit the occurrence of an accident.” “The unsafe condition is a hazardous physical condition or circumstance which could directly permit the occurrence of an accident.”

What is Bird and Loftus domino theory? ›

In 1976, Bird and Loftus extended the original Domino Model to include the following dominos: Lack of control by management, permitting. Basic causes (personal and job factors) that lead to. Immediate causes (substandard practices/conditions/errors), which are the proximate cause of.

What is single factor theory? ›

The single factor fallacy occurs when social scientists model their applied work largely around a single factor. The problem generally arises when either a highly relevant theory is ignored or when missing key variables distort the results.

What is the term accident? ›

noun. an undesirable or unfortunate happening that occurs unintentionally and usually results in harm, injury, damage, or loss; casualty; mishap: automobile accidents. Law. such a happening resulting in injury that is in no way the fault of the injured person for which compensation or indemnity is legally sought.

What are any three models to carry out accident analysis? ›

Among systemic accident models, Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP), Functional Resonance Accident Model (FRAM), and AcciMap methods have been identified as the most frequently cited models. This article presents a case study-based comparison of these three models.

What is the first step in reducing the cause of accident? ›

Cut Out Distractions

Thus, the first step to reduce your risk of being in an accident is to focus your attention on driving.

What are 4 E's to prevent accidents? ›

4 E's Road Safety :- The main thrust of accident prevention and control across the world has been on 4 E's vis (i) Education; (ii) Enforcement; (iii) Engineering; and (iv) Environment and Emergency care of road accident victims.

What is the importance of accident prevention? ›

A well-designed accident prevention program will reduce employee injury, illness and death rates; improve employee performance, strengthen workforce morale and motivation; and lower absentee rates.

What are the types of accidents caused by human error? ›

There are 3 types of active human error: Slips and lapses – made inadvertently by experienced operators during routine tasks; Mistakes – decisions subsequently found to be wrong, though the maker believed them to be correct at the time; and. Violations – deliberate deviations from rules for safe operation of equipment.

What is difference between accident and incident? ›

An “incident” is any unexpected event that does not result in serious losses or injury; an “accident” is an unexpected event that causes damage, injury, or harm.

What is accident prevention? ›

Accident prevention includes all measures taken in an effort to save lives, escape from injury, lessen the degrees of injury, avoid damage to property, reduce treatment and compensation costs, and prevent the loss of productive time and morale.

What is the purpose of an accident report? ›

To identify factors contributing to incidents or accidents. To provide a means to review and analyze recurring problems and determine their implications. To provide a means to identify necessary procedural changes that will eliminate or reduce potentially injurious conditions.

What is meaning of accident and explain the theory of occurrence? ›

Accidents are defined as unplanned occurrences which result in injuries, fatalities, loss of production or damage to property and assets. Preventing accidents is extremely difficult in the absence of an understanding of the causes of accidents.

What is accident proneness theory? ›

The term accident proneness was coined by psychological research workers in 1926. Since then its concept—that certain individuals are always more likely than others to sustain accidents, even though exposed to equal risk—has been questioned but seldom seriously challenged.

What is the Swiss Cheese model of accident causation? ›

The Swiss Cheese Model demonstrates how, generally, a failure cannot be traced back to a single root cause; accidents are often the result of a combination of factors. It suggests that most accidents are the result of latent errors, which are failures that are intrinsic to a procedure, machine, or system.

Which theory of accident causation suggests that removal of the central factor will prevent accidents and injuries? ›

Heinrich's theory has two central points: (1) Injuries are caused by the action of preceding factors and (2) removal of the central factor (unsafe act/hazardous condition) negates the action of the preceding factors and, in so doing, prevents accidents and injuries.

What are the 4 types of accidents? ›

  • Accidents at Work.
  • Road Traffic Accidents.
  • Sports Related Injuries.
  • Other Injury Claims.

What are the 3 causes of human error according to Ferrell's theory? ›

Human error is in turn caused by one of the three situations: overload, inappropriate response and inappropriate activities (Reason, 1990).

What is effect of accident? ›

The emotional impact of the accident itself as well as related injuries can lead to depression, withdrawal, isolation, feelings of hopelessness and suicidal thoughts. Anxiety is also a common condition diagnosed after accidents. Many survivors experience the effects of shock immediately after a collision.

How does the pure chance theory propose to prevent an accident? ›

According to the pure chance theory, every one of any given set of workers has an equal chance of being involved in an accident. It further implies that there is no single discernible pattern of events that leads to an accident.

What is accident prone area? ›

adjective. If you describe someone or something as accident prone, you mean that a lot of accidents or other unpleasant things happen to them.

What is energy transfer theory? ›

Energy Release Theory — a theory of accident causation and control, developed by Dr. William Haddon Jr., that portrays accidents in terms of energy transference. This transfer of energy, in large amounts and/or at rapid rates, can adversely affect living and nonliving objects, causing injury and damage.

Who created the accident causation model? ›

In 1919, Greenwood and Woods (1919) proposed the accident prone tendency, which became the first accident causation model in human history. The year 2019 marks the passage of 100 years of studies on accident causation models.

What is Swiss cheese technique? ›

The Swiss cheese method involves taking small bites of your task to poke holes into it. It's like teeny tiny wood ants feasting on large chunks of wood. They start biting off their herculean task at random spots until there are too many holes in it and the wood is all but a standing sculpture.

What is the purpose of Swiss Cheese Model? ›

Reason developed the "Swiss cheese model" to illustrate how analyses of major accidents and catastrophic systems failures tend to reveal multiple, smaller failures leading up to the actual hazard. In the model, each slice of cheese represents a safety barrier or precaution relevant to a particular hazard.

How does the domino theory can lead to the occurrence of an accident? ›

In the domino theory, all factors are connected and each of them is dependent on the preceding factor. This means that personal injury (represented as the final domino) occurs only as a result of an accident and the accident itself occurs occurs only as a result of a personal or mechanical hazard.

What are the four M's of the multiple factors theory? ›

The Multiple Factor Theory

This theory holds the belief that accidents are rarely, if ever, caused by a single event. Rather, multiple factors work together and culminate into a singular accident event. These factors can vary but are typically divided into four groups: man, machine, media and management.

Which accident theory is considered too simplistic and rarely used? ›

The domino model is widely seen today as being too simplistic to be a useful tool to help understand the causal factors of accidents: For an overview of models of causation used in safety management, see for example the chapter Models of Causation: Safety in the OHS Body of Knowledge published by the Safety Institute ...

Videos

1. Accident investigation | Causes of accident | Domino effect| Accident causation theory
(Zeeshan Tanzeem (safety management ))
2. What Causes Accidents? Accident Causation Theories | Top 10 causes of Accidents #safetyfirstlife
(SAFETY FIRST LIFE)
3. Accident Theories Presentation
(Hesham Elropi)
4. Accident causation theory in simple language
(AK Kapoor)
5. What is Accident / Types of Accident / Causes of Accident / Effects of Accident | HSE STUDY GUIDE
(HSE STUDY GUIDE)
6. Cat interrupts lecture on Theories of Accident Causation
(Nor Roslina Rosli)

Top Articles

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Laurine Ryan

Last Updated: 01/10/2023

Views: 5716

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Laurine Ryan

Birthday: 1994-12-23

Address: Suite 751 871 Lissette Throughway, West Kittie, NH 41603

Phone: +2366831109631

Job: Sales Producer

Hobby: Creative writing, Motor sports, Do it yourself, Skateboarding, Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Stand-up comedy

Introduction: My name is Laurine Ryan, I am a adorable, fair, graceful, spotless, gorgeous, homely, cooperative person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.